Powered by Blogger.

Home

The Quarter Point Cut

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

I was expecting half a point. I truly was but the US Fed decided to cut only a quarter and the markets, they of course plunged, free-falling in reaction to this news. The Dow ended up losing 294 points. ( Free fall after Fed cut )

And blogger
Kirk had compiled 10 quotable quotes on his latest posting: Thoughts On The Fed


  • "Thinking as a trader, the most counter-intuitive outcome here would be a resumption of the Santa rally and run into year end. It's just become my favored scenario, because it seems so outlandish after the Fed news." - Alan Farley

    "The assumption this afternoon is surely going to be that if the market falls so much on a day the Fed cut rates, then that has to be a bad sign going forward. I see the logic there, but logic usually doesn't have much place in the stock market. Going back to 1971, I checked for any time that the S&P dropped 1% or more on a day the Fed cut. There were only five instances that popped up, and the S&P formed at least a short-term low within two days four of those times. The best bet was had by waiting for an additional 1% - 2% of downside, then buying and holding for a few days or 2% - 5% upside." - Jason Goepfert

    "Aside from the declines seen on the FOMC day on the first trading day following 9/11, this is the worst decline on a Fed day since 1990. We went back and found all FOMC days in which the S&P 500 fell by more than 1% to see how the market has performed going forward. The results are positive for tomorrow and the next week, but negative from now to the next Fed meeting on January 30th." - Bespoke

    "I'll leave the berating of the Fed to others and will spend my energy trying to deal with this market. Things look very poor going forward. The technical conditions support further downside, and the Fed was really the only good positive catalyst we had going for us. Without that, we have some end-of-the-year seasonality that may help, but that is not a sure thing by any means." - Rev Shark

    "Fed members are probably amazed at the market reaction, believing that they not only did what seemed right on a policy basis but something close to market expectations. Wordsmiths need to come up with synonymous phrases for "behind the curve." I am sick of it already!" - Jeff Miller

    "With only a quarter-point cut, we will no longer be able to forestall the bankruptcies. Banks are holding on for dear life, homebuilders the same. But their lifeline just got choked and far fewer will live because of this. Lots of times people talk about stock traders being complacent. Lots of times you hear about bullish money managers that are way too excited about stocks. But I have never heard a statement from a more bullish group of people in my life. They genuinely think that inflation remains a big problem. I am aghast." - Jim Cramer

    "The Fed blew it once again. They are still behind the curve. Expect the bears to enjoy the fruits of the Fed's whiff as the A.I.R. pauses. They should just let me make monetary policy. Like 2000, 2004, and 2006 when I had major disagreements with their policy, I expect they will come around too little too late." - Robert Marcin

    "What is just breathtaking to me is that the Fed sees balanced risks between inflation and growth. I understand that the Fed is destined to be behind the curve (because it relies on past data to dictate policy that takes time to flow through the economy), but these guys are so behind the curve that they are getting lapped." - Dan Fitzpatrick

    "Dollars to donuts, perhaps literally, the FOMC couldn't cut fitty without invoking the wrath of foreign holders of dollar denominated assets. As it is, we're in a pretty pinch." - Todd Harrison

    "Boom Boom almost did the right thing. Had it spared us the pandering 1/4 point begged for by financial speculators, he would have finally shown the kind of stones that will be needed to guide us out of the current mess. Equities do not like it one bit, as well they shouldn't; the wimpy move is likely to worsen the credit environment and the financial markets as a whole could be in for a year-end pasting. So why do I suggest the Fed did the almost right thing? Because one cannot devalue its way out of a gigantic pile of debt. Companies, many companies, need to fail, go away forever, and allow those who have a business existing to once again prosper not on the back of borrowed money, but on the strength of real demand, rather than demand generated by a need to circulate make belief money. Had the Fed figured this out in 2001, by 2003 we would likely have forgotten the then recession. Instead it decided to try to fool everyone into believing that we could borrow our way into a permanent plateau of prosperity." - Fil Zucchi

And over at FinancialSense, market commentator, Frank Barbera, has penned a brilliant The End of Denial posting.

  • So it is today. The US is entering a very difficult period, and investors need to be attuned to priority Number One—don’t lose valuable capital. This means being very attentive to potential risks, and looking always at both sides of the equation, and when initiating a trade, knowing in advance how much risk you plan to take, and precisely where you draw your line in the sand in order to get out. In rising markets, where the trend is strongly higher, it is easy to make money and everyone is a genius. In down markets, that algorithm is inverted, as down markets are designed to separate investors from capital, with the bottom of the downside cycle yielding the uncontrolled panic phone call to the trading desk -- “Get me out NOW!” This is the scene of despondency, desperation and capitulation which attends panic sell offs in down markets. In the chart below, we trace the human emotional side of the cycle for you, with this author’s opinion that right now, Denial marks the current stage for this cycle.



    Why Denial? Simply because despite the collapse of untold businesses, and the virtual shut down of key credit markets, markets have tried to look past the problems on the hope that the Fed or Powers that be would come riding to the rescue. Today’s market was significant, and all investors should take careful note. Today, was the first day that the stock market publicly questioned the Fed, in its own way saying, ‘things are really bad, so what are you going to do about it?” That is a sign of situational awareness, and that is a sign that we are moving from avoiding the recognition of the problem to confronting and peering toward the problem. Looking at the problem, the market sees fear, the next step in the down market, and for that reason, today represents a big psychological downshift for the stock market. Just how big, we cannot know, but the days ahead will tell the tale. It is been my experience in a now nearly 27 year career watching stock prices that the ‘persistency of selling’ is the key ingredient to watch over the next 5 to 10 days. Can the market bounce, can it sustain a bounce, how long can it sustain a bounce, or does it continue to crater all the way back to the November 26th lows?

And here is the Fed's statement posted at CNN: Read the Fed's statement

How now Brown Cow?

Is it really all gloom and doom with just a quarter point cut?

Read more...

Suit Filed Against 2 Megan Officials

Monday, December 10, 2007

Read this news article on Business Times: SC files charges against 2 Megan Media officials

  • THE Securities Commission (SC) has filed criminal charges against two former officials of diskmaker Megan Media Holdings Bhd for allegedly making false statements to Bursa Malaysia in relation to the company's revenue figures.

    Revenues in question totalled a staggering RM1.81 billion for various periods.

    Kenneth Kok Hen Sen @ Kok Liew Sen, the former financial controller of Megan Media, and Datuk Dr Mohd Adam Che Harun, the former executive chairman and director, were named in an indictment at the Sessions Court yesterday.

    Kok was also the special assistant to Mohd Adam during the material time of the offence.

    In addition to the criminal charges, the SC has obtained a warrant of arrest against the former executive director of Megan Media, George Yeo Wee Siong.

    The SC is seeking the assistance of Interpol to trace and arrest Yeo, who is wanted on similar charges.

    Kok is charged with four counts of violating section 122B(a)(bb) read together with section 122C(c) of the Securities Industry Act 1983 (SIA).

    The SC charged Kok with abetting Megan Media in furnishing to Bursa Malaysia false revenue figures of RM1,034,797,000 in the group's books for the year ended April 30 2006, RM230,365,000 for the period ended July 31 2006, RM238,134,000 for the period ended October 31 2006 and RM306,150,000 for the period ended January 31 2007.

    The SC's complaint against Mohd Adam alleges that he furnished a false statement relating to the revenue figure of RM306,150,000 for the company's financial period ended January 31 2007 under section 122B(a)(bb) read together with section 122(1) SIA.

    Upon conviction, the accused are liable under section 122B SIA to a fine not exceeding RM3 million, or imprisonment of not more than 10 years, or both.

Which reminded me of this blog posting posted on Aug 7th 2007, in which I blogged on Megan's Other Bossie

  • KUALA LUMPUR: Megan Media Holdings Bhd executive chairman Datuk Mohd Adam Che Harun disposed of a total of 6.26 million warrants of the company between April 25 and May 4, a filing to Bursa Malaysia on Aug 3 showed.
  • According to Bursa filings, Mohd Adam sold the block of warrants on the open market via five transactions, which saw his warrants holdings in Megan Media being reduced to 63,700 units or 0.09%.

The point mentioned in that blog posting was..

  • Point is the transactions was DONE between April 25 and May 4 and these transactions was only recorded and announced on Aug 3rd 2007?
    Why did it take so long to file?

How?

Read more...

Can you say Big?

Sunday, December 9, 2007

Saw this news article posted on bloomberg:


  • Derivative Trades Soar to Record $681 Trillion in Third Quarter

    By Hamish Risk

    Dec. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Derivatives traded on exchanges surged 27 percent to a record $681 trillion in the third quarter, the biggest increase in three years, the Bank for International Settlements said.

    Interest-rate futures, contracts designed to speculate on or hedge against moves in borrowing rates, led the increase with a 31 percent increase to $594 trillion during the three months ended Sept. 30, the Basel, Switzerland-based BIS said today in its quarterly review. The amounts are based on the notional amount underlying the contracts.

    Trading surged as investors bet on losses linked to record U.S. mortgage foreclosures and policy changes by the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank to offset the credit slump. The Fed cut its benchmark interest rate by half a point to 4.75 percent in September, the central bank's first reduction in four years.

    ``The turbulence in financial markets led to the busiest trading on record,'' BIS analysts Ryan Stever, Christian Upper and Goetz von Peter wrote in the report.

    Trading in stock index futures and options rose 19 percent to a record $81 trillion in the third quarter, as investors speculated on whether the credit-market losses would spread to the equity markets.
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ad71potU0EbM&refer=home
USD$681 Trillion.

My oh my.

Read more...

Blaine Lourd: The Evolution of An Investor

Friday, December 7, 2007

Here's one truly fantastic reading material for the weekend, The Evolution of an Investor ( The link to this article was posted on The Kirk Report ). Article was written by Michael Lewis who penned Liars Poker.

Here are some snippet of what's
stuff written..

  • "Seven months in at Lehman, I was one of the top rookie producers," Blaine says, "but every stock I bought went down." His ability to be wrong about the direction of an individual stock was uncanny, even to him. At first, he didn’t understand why his customers didn’t fire him, but soon he came to take their inertia for granted. "It was amazing, the gullibility of the investor," he says. "When you got a new customer, all you needed to do was get three trades out of him. Because one of them is going to work. But you have to get the second one done before the first one goes bad."

    It wasn't exactly the career he’d hoped for. Once, he confessed to his boss his misgivings about the performance of his customers' portfolios. His boss told him point-blank, "Blaine, you're confused about your job." A fellow broker added, "Your job is to turn your clients' net worth into your own." Blaine wrote that down in his journal.

Blaine quit his job at Lehmans...

  • He quit Lehman Brothers and took a job at the Los Angeles office of Bear Stearns. But Bear wasn’t any better. He says he was pressured to make transactions rather than give good advice. The stories he told himself to feel better about his career became less and less plausible. The nicest thing he could say about himself was that he hadn’t broken the law. He hadn’t bankrupted anyone or anything like that. But when he stepped back from his job and really looked at it, he realized that a huge amount of his time and energy went into making people feel happy about his advice when they should have been furious. The problem was the constant tension between company and client, caused by the firm’s inability to know what the market or any particular stock was going to do next. “I always thought there was going to be a place where the client wouldn’t be compromised and the broker wouldn’t be compromised,” he says. “But it was the same everywhere. It was all about getting people to transact.” And these weren’t bucket shops; they were Wall Street’s most distinguished firms.

Niagara Falls... loved how it was told.


  • Back in the old days, when investors believed that they were paying for some mysterious wisdom, the buildings housing Wall Street firms were stone on the outside and dark wood on the inside. Now that investors have learned to fear what they can’t see, the firms are in buildings made of as much glass as can be incorporated into a structure without compromising its ability to stand. The day I arrive at D.F.A.'s offices, I find 150 financial advisers in a glass box, waiting to be educated in a seminar that lays out the D.F.A. way. The coffee and pastries are free, the men and women wear suits, and the conference room has the antiseptic feel of any other 21st-century firm. But the atmosphere is entirely different from Wall Street. There’s no chitchat about the market, even though it has been bouncing around wildly. Instead, two speakers discuss how, knowing what we now know, anyone could present himself as a stock-picking guru. "If you put a thousand people in barrels and push them over Niagara Falls," one of them says, "some of them will survive. And if you take those guys and push them over again, some of them will survive. And they’ll write books about how to survive being pushed over Niagara Falls in a barrel."

Waking up to the lie and Winning the Loser's Game

  • Blaine bought the book—it's actually called Winning the Loser's Game —and took it with him to Aspen on his Christmas vacation. There, on the first page, he read "Investment management, as traditionally practiced, is based on a single basic belief: Professional investment managers can beat the market. That premise appears to be false."Ellis, who had spent 30 years advising Wall Street firms, went on with charts, graphs, and more evidence than he needed to convince Blaine of the truth of that statement. The problem wasn't Blaine; the problem wasn't even the firms he worked for. The problem was the entire edifice of modern Wall Street, in which some people—brokers, analysts, mutual fund managers, hedge fund managers—presented themselves as experts and were paid fantastic sums of money for their expertise. But essentially, Ellis argued, there was no such thing as financial expertise. "I read this book," Blaine says, "and I thought, My whole life is a lie, and everyone around me is facilitating this lie."

I guess and I should stop here. Do give the rest of the article a read, The Evolution of an Investor

Cheers and Happy Weekend Shopping!

Read more...

Tougher Action Proposed Against Dishonest Directors

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Published on the BTimes: Tougher measures proposed against dishonest directors

  • One of the recommendations is that criminal sanctions be imposed for the contravention of directors' duties that are accompanied by fraud or dishonesty.

    If directors had failed in their duties but there was no fraud or dishonesty, the regulators should be able to then initiate civil proceedings against them, the CLSC proposed.

    It also recommended that regulators be given a general power to initiate civil proceedings in its own name on behalf of the company if it appears to be in the public's interest to do so.

WOW. Christmas came early. I love this proposal but dear Santa, could you ensure that this is more than a proposal? Am I asking too little if I ask for stringent enforcement of the proposal?

What a great way to start the morning.

The gloom caused by the continuous rain did not help either and this news article was simply the tonic I am looking for. Reminds me of one this favorite rock song of mine by the legendary rock group Boston. (wasn't it 1976 when the song was released?)

I looked out this morning and the sun was gone
Turned on some music to start my day
I lost myself in a familiar song
I closed my eyes and I slipped away ...

Here's the video I loved the best posted at Youtube.







Read more...

Profiting From Our Mistake(s)

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

I have been spending times reading back my own notes. Stuff that I had written some many years ago.

Here's something I wrote back in May 2004 in a closed forum.

Enjoy!

Quote:

  • If a man didn't make mistakes he'd own the world in a month. But if he didn't profit by his mistakes he wouldn't own a blessed thing.

    - Edwin Lefevre - Reminiscences of a Stock Operator


May 2003. This is probably where I would say the current (KLSE) rally had started. A good year has passed us by and it is probably a wise thing to reminiscence this past one year.

( Wait ... wait....... do not take this posting for granted. Firstly, this is not an exercise in vanity, ok? Yeah, this ain't another discussion on what is the best strategy or the best way to make money in the market. Yes, this is not a posting debating who is correct and who is wrong! Ok? )

Yes, during the past one year, I have seen so many various strategies applied in the market in an attempt to make money. Some punted and simply whacked the market, some whacked simply based on hot-air, some used various trading techniques and skills, which included trading in a short term basis, scalping, tape reading, swinging and day trading, while some others traded on a longer term basis based on Market Timing or cycles, and some simply invested in the market - yeah the buy and hold long, long buggers, and then we have the more technical savvy techno canSLIMers, traders/investors who combine ta/fa in their strategy and then there were some who simply bought and prayed hard-hard!

For me, I believe that it's rather paramount that one develops to understand fully what one have and have not done correctly in the stock market and perhaps the most importing thing at this point of time is, are we gonna profit from our past mistake(s)?

Take a look at us. The index is still up a good 100 pts plus since last May (2003). Just how exactly are we doing?

Good, bad or so-so?

Is there something wrong in our system? Are we 'playing the game' correctly or are we in the need to go on a Holy Grail search for the best method?

Now, for the holy grail searchers, those switch hitters who moves from one system to another in search for the best method, the biggest problem and the biggest risk is simply time.

Mistakes cost money and what if one takes too long to discover our mistakes?

Each system/strategy has got its own winning point and its weak point. And this the holy grail seekers greatest risk. Finding, testing and discovering each strategy takes time and lots of mistakes will occur along the way.

And of course, the ultimate question would be: could one ultimately find the best ever technique?

Is there ever a 100% fool proof strategy? What if it takes you too long a time to find it? And what if there isn't such a thing as a perfect strategy?

Ahhh... how now Brown Cow?

Profiting from our mistake(s). This is I think is the ultimate key. Be it if you are an investor or you are a trader. So the alternative is to take a good review of what we have done and what we have not done correctly the past year. Look at our own methods. Can we avoid repeating the same mistake or we doomed to make the same mistake again? Are we even using the technique correctly? (remember the argument of where they said the system is usually correct, it is the user of the system which is wrong!) Or even to the more extreme, is do we acknowledge the flaws in our own system? And lastly, is our current system really a no-hoper?

how?

~~~~

Bursa Malaysia is now at 1442.73. At its highest ever.

So just how are we all doing?

Are we still searching for the Holy Grail?

Have we profited from our past mistake(s)?

~~~~

As the above was written in a forum posting, I did write another posting...

  • Yeah, realizing and admitting our mistakes is very important as I have witnessed folks who are stubbornly steadfast in insisting that they were always right and they just blamed their poor fortunes on irrational stuff like poor luck.

    Anyway, it does look like switching stocks is kinda popular, ain't it? The most popular switch is selling the top gainers - or selling a stock after it appreciates a certain percentage, and a switch is made into a stock that have not performed yet. Now assuming that our judgement and stock selections are correct, what exactly are we doing? What exactly is such a strategy suggesting and what exactly is the weakness in such system? Well it looks to me that we are limiting the gains in the top gainer stock. And when we switch to one and it fails, then what we have done is rather silly because we have sold out our star performer and bought a stock that might turn out to be a non-perfomer into our piggy bank.

    Just immagine, footie, say u are Arsene Wenger and the best perfomer in the team is Va-va-room (T.Henry), could u immagine if Arsene sold Va-va-room and purchase a non performing striker such as Diego Forlan??!! lol... lol ..... ridiculously silly ain't it? Yup, this is the very basic risk. We limit the performance of our star performers and we switch to one, which we may not know if it will perform, or not. However, if it works out, aren't we a genius? And of course the common argument for switching is that one is protecting one's profits....
    (ROFLMAO!!!)

    Then there are those who switch or rather they get rid of them poor performers in their portfolio. Would it work? It might and if does work out, then great. However, what if one witch to another stock that will perform even worse? It could happen, couldn't it?

    And every time we switches, one tends to sacrifice a little on the quality and the price one pays for their investments. Yes, one tend to pay a slightly higher PE for their switched stock and perhaps one opts for a more lesser quality stock, and when one does this too often, when the 'so-called game ends', ie the market rally ends, what does one ultimately ends up with? Can u imagine the chain of events? Isn't there a strong likely hood that one ends up with a basket of poorer quality stocks, purchased at a higher price? (And I would guess the best advice here is not too switch too often, rite? )

    As u can tell from my biased writing, I am not a switcher and I admit I am very much against switching. However, I would very much like to hear from anyone who has developed and maintain a strong winning strategy in switching stocks.
    Anyone willing to share?

Read more...

MP Tech

Monday, December 3, 2007

Blogged on this stock several times.

7th Sept 2006:
MP Tech



  • The Board of Directors wish to announce that it has discovered certain financial irregularities which maybe fraudulant. These discoveries were made by Special Committe set-up by the Board in March 2006 and headed by Dato' Krishna Kumar, the Company's Independant Director.

And i made the following comments:

  • How ironic cause MP Tech started reporting losses in its quarterly earnings reported in Oct 2005 and has since posted 4 consecutive quarterly losses (totalling some 33.7 million!!)!!!!So now the discovery of certain financial irregularities which maybe fraudulant????

Updated the posting on 22nd Jan 2007: Update on MP Tech

  • I remember this one hor... this bugger took over Kelanamas Industries Bhd listing under a restructuring exercise back in 2004 and then it started playing funky music by announcing it was diversifying into the cement business... AHEM... and then that was not all... back in June 2005...

Four days later, MP Tech announced its quarterly earnings and I made the following posting: MP Technology announced its Quarterly Earnings. Quarterly losses totalled 133.274 million!

It was truly amazing because MP Tech announced then too that the financial position of the company was insolvent.

In today's Star Biz, the following article caught my attention: PN 17 firms to be delisted, removed

  • PN 17 firms to be delisted, removed

    KUALA LUMPUR: The securities of three Practice Note 17 companies – FA Peninsular Bhd, MP Technology Resources Bhd (MP Tech) Syarikat Kayu Wangi Bhd (SKW) – will be delisted and removed from the official list of Bursa Malaysia on Dec 13.

    Bursa said in a statement FA Peninsular would be delisted for failure to make the requisite announcement of its regularisation plans by Nov 30.

    It said MP Tech would be delisted for failure to submit its regularisation plan to the Securities Commission (SC) and other relevant authorities for approval by Sept 25.

    For SKW, it would be delisted as the SC had, vide its letters dated Aug 9 and Nov 6, rejected its regularisation plan and its appeal against the rejection respectively.

    “For MP Tech and SKW, another reason for the delisting is that both companies do not have adequate level of financial conditions to warrant continued listings,” it said.

    Bursa said upon the delisting of the companies, they would continue to exist but as an unlisted entities. – Bernama

So what more can I say about MP Tech?

Got listed via RTO of Kelanamas in 2004. Insolvent by Jan 2007. To be delisted on Dec 2007!

Now value destruction or what!!

And I would like to know how MP Tech managed to get listed via the RTO Kelanamas!

Read more...

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP