Powered by Blogger.

Home

Another Interview with Dr.Marc Faber

Friday, August 17, 2007

Here are excerpts from CNBC_TV18 exclusive intereview with Dr. Marc Faber

  • Q: How do you read the events as they have unfolded in the past fortnight? How do you think this might shape up?

    A: Basically as you know, the US market went up until July 16. The Dow peaked out on July 17 above 14,000 and then it started to slide, mainly driven by financial stocks and by what people call a crisis in the subprime lending sector and the CDO and the BS markets. The question obviously is where do we go from here? Is it like 1998, where we dropped first and then recovered strongly towards the end of the year or is it something more serious? I think it's something more serious.

    Q: What’s your prognosis? You think this subprime situation will become worse or do you think these are just indicative of deeper problems in the US economy, which are manifesting themselves?

    A: It’s a symptom of excessive credit growth that was obviously encouraged by the US Fed. They pursued extremely expansionary monitory policies before the year 2000, when they bailed out LTCM and then ahead of Y2K that boosted the NASDAQ between January and March 2000 another 30%. And then obviously by slashing the Fed fund rate from 6.5% to 1% and
    leaving it at 1% for an extended period of time and then as a Fed Chairman, also encouraging people to take out variable mortgages and applauding the subprime lending industry - that has to be said very clearly.

    I think the Fed now has obviously stepped in. They bought mortgage-backed securities on last Friday. The ECB has also stepped in, but you create another problem by doing that. You don’t let the market kind of clear and so I suppose what we will eventually get, is more inflation and higher interest rates.

    Q: You're saying that the Dow has reasonable chance of plunging below 13,000, or well below that?

    A: We went up on the Dow in October 2002, when the Dow was around 7,600, to 14,000. This February in the correction we were at 12,000 on the Dow. The S&P has risen to a high of 1,555 on July 16. We are now down a 100-points.

    I think it's not so much a question about how vulnerable the market is, but what is the upside potential. I think the upside potential is extremely limited and I would advise people to actually sell their shares on a rebound. We’re modestly oversold at the present times, some stocks are more oversold than others. Goldman Sachs is down 20% from its peak in a very brief period of time. So there will be bounces, but I would use the bounces as a selling opportunity and not think that this is just the correction in a rising market.

    Q: If you did sell out, where would you park your money as there is some opinion suggesting that maybe in this seesaw, Asia and emerging markets will stand at the upper end, while the rest of the developed universe will probably struggle for a bit?

    A: That I disagree with, because over the last 3-4 years, a lot of overseas foreign money has flowed into emerging economies and if you compare the performance of Dow Jones to that of the Indian market, then the Indian market is up five times since 2003.
    So lot of markets are very over extended. When you have a credit cycle of liquidity that turns down and this is a credit super cycle that now has run into some problems along with the process of de-leveraging. In such an environment you don’t what to be an emerging economy.

    The outlook for the economies may be favourable, but the outlook for liquidity in emerging stock markets is not very favourable. Starting summer 2005, the housing stocks in the US start to break down and the optimist said don’t worry. Then starting summer of 2006, the subprime lenders started to break down and the optimist said don’t worry, it wont have an impact on the economy. This year, we have a break down of brokerage companies and financial stocks and it's like a domino effect that goes from one sector of the economy to another.

    Q: So is it unlikely that equity markets from the emerging space will make new highs for themselves this year?

    A: There is always the possibility that some market makes a new high. If I had to make a bet about the market that will make a new high, I would think that the gold market has a chance to make a new high. Because if the Fed cuts interest rates aggressively, in an extreme case, they would go from 5.25% on the Fed fund rate down to 3%. Then people will really become concerned about future inflation and the value of paper money and that will boost gold prices.

    But right now my sense is that the best is to hold cash. Now the question is what kind of cash? People have been very negative about the dollar but I have noticed over the last two weeks, the dollar has actually began to perform better against the emerging market currencies - against the New Zealand dollar against the Australian dollar, it’s been weaker against the yen, but the US dollar is okay. Because if a foreign investor sells emerging stock markets, they convert the fund into US dollar and that should be supportive of the US dollar.

    Q: You advised many hedge funds. Do you sense that the whole universe is running into a bit of trouble and hedge fund managers are looking to pare down exposure to emerging markets?

    A: During the period 2002 to 2006, we had an increase in leverage. To perform you just built up your positions, financed with credits and now we have the process of de-leveraging. In other words, positions are being cut by the proprietary trading departments of banks, by hedge funds and by the insurance industry. And don’t forget a lot of family offices have behaved like hedge funds, they have also huge leverage positions and the funds are funds anyway.

    So in this environment there is a general contraction of outstanding debts,
    the credit contraction is not good for asset markets.

    Q: If you had to predict - since your view is bearish, what percentage fall would you expect in emerging market equities over the next foreseeable period?

    A: The S&P has a very good chance to decline by 20-30% and the emerging economy stock markets could drop by 40%. That may not mean that the bull market in emerging market is over for good, because in 1987 we had drops in Taiwan of 50% and then the market went up another four times, so you can have a big correction and still be in the bull market.

    But if some one came to me and said what is the upside on the S&P? We had 1,452 where the high was 1,555. I would say the upside and the big resistance in the market is between 1,520 and 1,530 so the upside is limited. But what about the risk?

    What I noticed is investors are far more concerned about missing the next leg in the bull market on the upside, than about the risk of losing a lot of money. And I think, gradually this will change and that would mean lower equity prices and also prices of other assets such as commodities can go down substantially and obviously home prices around the world.

Source of article: http://www.moneycontrol.com/india/news/fii-view/a-lotemsover-extended-marc-faber/12/49/297874

Read more...

How Now Brown Cow?

The Fed cuts its discount rate and the US Stocks Soars.

Over at FSO market wrap, Mr. Brian Pretti wrote the following:


  • At the end of March of this year, I penned a discussion entitled, “It’s Delightful, It’s Delovely, It’s Deleverage!." If you don’t mind, just a quick snippet from the final paragraph of that piece to set the tone, if you will.

    “It's clear that market participants of today are wildly complacent about, or simply do not understand, the potential for risk in structured finance vehicles and the layering of levered investment, especially in the hedge community. The fact that a number of hedge funds were "surprised" to find they had sub prime exposure in their CDO investments simply tells us that even the masters of the universe do not have all of their hands around the question of investment risk. In straight up markets, there are few questions. But in the current environment, there will also be very few questions asked if meaningful downside is to unfold. Rather, those being hurt by leverage in what could become a punishing market environment will shoot first and save the questions for later. The double edge sword of leverage tends to evoke those types of responses. Little time for philosophical debate when one is losing money. Funny how that works.”

    So, about four and one half months after this was written, here we now stand today in full view of “the other side” of many a levered investment strategy...

Do give the rest or the article a read: Stress Management

Read more...

How Now Brown Cow?

Thursday, August 16, 2007

In today's Financial Sense Market Wrap, market commentator address the issue of whether the long term interest rates are heading higher. Conclusion: Long Term Interest Rates are Heading Higher


  • The recent market selloff was accompanied by a flight to the safety of Treasuries. Stocks down, bonds up – recently we’ve seen this seemingly day after day. However, it is important to note that in spite of this short term action, the long term trend in long interest rates has changed from down to up. Even though rallies in the bond market (interest rates lower) have been sharp and convincing, the long view supports the conclusion that long term interest rates are heading higher. One technical chart supporting this conclusion is illustrated below. Upward trending interest rates that occurred in the 1960’s finally topped in 1982. High rates of inflation accompanied the rising long term trend in interest rates. The secular bull market in stocks began in 1982, and this generally corresponded to the start of a long interest rate downtrend. Stocks bottomed when interest rates topped. From 1982 until recently, there was an active downtrend in long term interest rates; however, the trend of lower interest rates is likely over, and long term interest rates are likely in a young secular uptrend.



    Below is a weekly chart of the 10-year Treasury note yield from 1990 to the present. The bottoming of interest rates in mid-2003 was followed by a series of higher highs and higher lows shown on the right hand side of the chart. In spite of the current bond market rally caused by an apparent flight to safety, this was only sufficient to produce a settling back of interest rates to the 2-year (104 week) moving average (thus far). This “flight to safety” appears only as an insignificant tick in the far right side of the long term chart.



    Similarly, the 30-year Treasury note yield is illustrated below. The top annotated line simply connects the important interest rate highs, and the bottom line connects the important lows. It is apparent that the highs have leveled out, and the lows are now trending higher. Conclusion: The long term trend of long interest rates is higher. What would invalidate this conclusion? A decisive break of the trend of higher lows in the 10-year note yield (above chart), or a decisive break of the trendline defined as higher lows beginning in mid 2005 (below chart).


And the chart below says a thousand words!!!!!!!!!!!



Here's another article that's worth reading: Financial System in Jeopardy

Read more...

Ornasteel IV

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

My Dearest Ngok Yee,

Ornasteel reported its earnings last night.

This is their updated earnings table.



I would like to compare the current earnings with the issues brought up in the last posting
Review on OrnaSteel Again. (So what I will do is, I will repeat the old comments here and add in new comments in purple italic fonts again)

First the minus point.

1. As you know, OrnaSteel belongs in the highly cyclical steel industry. And as seen above, the past 2 years were rather disappointing in terms of earnings performance. ( There is a clear turnaround in earnings! ) (Again yes the turnaround the earnings is there. On average, this is a fantastic set of earnings, however I am sure the disappointment is there. Let's be honest, I for one, was expecting much more.)

2. The company dabbles in the share market!....


  • Is this a concern?
  • Is this getting out of hand?
  • Why so poor results in such a hot market?
  • Does the fund manger know what he/she is doing?
  • Does this bug you??
As reported in last night earnings:

The status of the Group’s investment in marketable securities as at the end of the reporting quarter is as follows:-

(i) at cost: RM46.240 million;
(ii) at carrying value: RM46.563 million; and
(iii) at market value: RM46.563 million .

The company purchased more shares!


How?

Is this a worry?

The better points.

1. Although Ornasteel earnings performance was disappointing for fy 2005 and fy 2006, it held up strongly during times when demand and prices were poor. So the assumption is when the good times come, surely Ornasteel would perform much better. ( Performance is decent!)
(Yes, performance is indeed decent!)

2. How the company transformed itself from a net debt to a net cash company is most impressive. (this now not a better point as OrnaSteel turned into a net debt company of 5.999 million!
(Company is now in a nett cash of 79.903 million)

3. Dividends. Last year, Ornasteel paid a 5% less tax ( First and Final Dividend ). This year, a 10% less tax had already being proposed. ( RECOMMENDATION OF A FIRST AND FINAL DIVIDEND OF 10% OR 10 SEN PER SHARE LESS 27% ) ( Still waiting! ) (Dividend has been paid)

4. The market. Market till today is around 1350 points. Surely AmIncome Fund would have performed some little bitsy bit of wonder for Ornasteel's investment, right? ( Do they know what they are doing! ) ( Where is the results?)

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Overall, the earnings is decent. However as mentioned, perhaps I had expected a much better set of earnings from Ornasteel, hence I am disappointed because if compared to previous quarter, earnings is really flat. And the issue that bugs me is the company's dabbling in the market. I have always preferred companies to return their excess cash back to its shareholders.

The following are some notes from the company earnings notes:

Review of performance

The Group achieved revenue of RM373.0 million and pretax profit of RM29.5 million for the quarter under review. This represents an increase of RM124.0 million or 49.8% higher in revenue than that of its corresponding quarter. Profit before tax improves by RM3.8 million or 15.0% to RM29.5 million from RM25.6 million in the corresponding quarter.

The improved performance is primarily attributable to higher selling prices and higher sale volume of our steel products in the quarter under review compare with the corresponding quarter as a result of higher demand for our products. However, pre-tax profit does not increase proportionately due to higher increase in the cost of raw materials for the quarter under review.

Current year prospects

The result for the first half of 2007 has been quite satisfactory. The demand for our products for the second half of 2007 is expected to be slightly weak in Malaysia although the demand for steel worldwide is still increasing. Domestically, the release of infrastructure projects from the Ninth Malaysia Plan may help to mitigate the expected drop in steel demand. However due to the oversupply of steel from China and some cheap imports from neighbouring countries, the price of steel is under pressure. Barring any unforeseen circumstances, we expect this price pressure to be temporary and would not significantly affect the profitability of the Group for the rest of the year


Old postings:
Review on OrnaSteel Again and Review on OrnaSteel and Ornasteel

Read more...

How Now Brown Cow?

Here is a fantastic posting from Dr. Brett.

  • Suppose you're contemplating a sailing trip. The weather forecast suggests only 10% chance of a thunderstorm, so you decide to set sail.

    As you get out onto the ocean, you notice a few raindrops. Then you notice the sky darkening. The air pressure begins to fall rapidly.

    What do you do: continue your voyage or pull into port?

    When traders examine the historical record for what markets have done under particular conditions, they come up with their own weather forecasts for the market. When conditions have been bullish, the forecasts after market declines are apt to be bullish.

    But suppose you begin to venture into the market and notice fewer stocks making new highs. Then you observe more selling pressure than buying with respect to the NYSE TICK. You see the advance-decline line making new lows. You see continued signs of risk aversion among institutional traders.

    What do you do: continue buying the market or pull back?

Click here for the rest of the article: http://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2007/08/bit-of-perspective.html

And over at FSO, market commentator asks if Reality Setting In?

Read more...

BCT III

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

My Dearest Doc,

Here is an update to posting:
BCT Part II

BCT announced its earnings yesterday. I have updated the earnings table.



Extremely early days but I am more than likely to be sceptical cause the first 2 quarters of fy 07 earnings (3.546 + 2.720) is less than the last 2 quarters of its fy 06 (2.335 + 4.015). However, it's still very much early days for now.

I would compare what this earnings with what I had written in the previus posting (
BCT Part II ). (Added new comments in italics)

>>>>>

Total earnings for the 3 quarters is some 9.896 million. ( Total net earnings for these 4 quarters is now 12.616 million)

Regarding the last two paragpraphs. The comments from HDBS and KN.

Jun 8th, 2007, from HDBS

  • Cheap stock. With 3-year CAGR of 40%, BCTT shares are trading at only 5.0x FY08F EPS. We believe it should be worth 8x FY08 EPS or RM1.70/share, which implies a very conservative 0.2x PEG.

Key note for me is 3-year CAGR of 40%. (CAGR of 40%???!!!)

This means that HDBS is really assuming and expecting an amazing growth for BCT. Have a look at HDBS earnings table posted below.

So, BCT which earned 10.5 million for its last fiscal year ( its current earnings for 3 quarters is 9.896 million) is expected to earn 25.8 million by FY 2008. (We now have 4 quarters of earnings and they only total 12.616 million. Based on these earnings indications, yes BCT would probably perform much better than its last fiscal year earnings of 10.5 million... )

And because it is expected to do so good, and based on this expected achievement, BCT is then reasoned cheap by HDBS.

For it's rather optimistic.

Let's compare with KN.

Jun 11th, 2007, from KN

  • Maintain BUY with a revised 12-month target price of RM1.56 (+30.0%) based on a FY08 P/E of 10.0x (2-year (FY06-FY08) PEG ratio of just 0.52x). BCTT’s FY07 and FY08 net profit growth of 45.9% and 38.6% y-y remain respectable despite our slight exchange rate driven earnings downgrades. At RM1.03, BCTT shares are trading at highly attractive FY07 and FY08 P/E of 8.8x and 6.6x, respectively.

My opinion? Strange. Cos how could "BCTT’s FY07 and FY08 net profit growth of 45.9% and 38.6% y-y remain respectable" when this is but just a projection. Doesn't BCT has to achieve these targets before being getting its respects? (At this rate, the earnings growth is simply not going to be as terror as projected!)

Anyway, here is KN's earnings table projection for BCT.

KN's net earnings projection for BCT's FY 2008 is 20.9 million. Which is much lower than HDBS projection of 28.9 million!

So for me, it appears to me, that the high target prices are assigned to BCT because both HDBS and KN expects fantastic growth for BCT.

Is this achievable?

For me, this is one of the issue I would address. However, as it is, there isn't much data available but 3 quarterly earnings data from BCT.

How? As mentioned earlier, we now have 4 quarters of earnings and they only total 12.616 million. Based on these earnings indications, yes BCT would probably perform much better than its last fiscal year earnings of 10.5 million... which is decent by all means BUT the performance shown by BCT simply pales in comparison to what HDBS and KN had projected.

Rgds

Read more...

Here comes Mr. Bear?

Friday, August 10, 2007

Posted on Bloomberg news: U.S. Stocks Are at Start of Bear Market, Faber Says


  • Aug. 10 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks are at the beginning of a bear market in which benchmark indexes may fall more than 30 percent, investor Marc Faber said.

    Faber, managing director of Marc Faber Ltd. and publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom Report, said losses in mortgage-backed bonds are not ``contained or easily solvable'' with interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. He predicted in an interview today that the Dow Jones Industrial Average will drop below 12,000.

    Faber said investors conditioned to buy stocks on dips helped push the indexes to records after sell-offs in February and June. Emerging markets are particularly vulnerable to a so- called correction, or decline of more than 10 percent, because investors have bought into them heavily, he said. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index has dropped 9.9 percent since climbing to a record on July 23, cutting its gain for the year to 15 percent.

    The Federal Reserve yesterday added $24 billion in temporary funds to the banking system, the most since April, amid an increase in demand for cash from banks roiled by U.S. subprime loan losses. Traders are speculating that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at an emergency meeting as soon as next week, according to Merrill Lynch & Co.

    ``I'm very critical of central banks,'' Faber said. ``They may bail out the system, but there will be a cost, and the cost will be inflation.''

    Market Calls

    Faber told investors to bail out of U.S. stocks a week before the 1987 Black Monday crash, according to his Web site. He correctly predicted in May 2005 that stocks would make little headway that year. The S&P 500 gained 3 percent. He also told investors to buy gold in 2001, before it more than doubled.

    On March 29, Faber said the emergence of home loan concerns meant the stock market was unlikely to benefit from the conditions that supported its rally since June 2006. The S&P 500 climbed 10 percent between then and July 19, when it reached a record, and has fallen 6.4 percent since then.

Read more...

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP