Powered by Blogger.

Home

Showing posts with label MUI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MUI. Show all posts

What about MUI Ind?

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Let's have a look at what MUI IND (3891) has done this decade. What I will do is a simple look at MUI Ind's yearly Q4 earnings report posted at Bursa website.

Date announced: Feb 2000. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/12/1999

MUI Ind made 42 million for the fiscal year. (Note: Its previous fiscal year, MUI Ind lost 562 million!)

Feb 2001. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/12/2000

MUI Ind lost 64 million for the fiscal year.

Feb 2002. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/12/2001

MUI Ind lost 17 million for the fiscal year.

Feb 2003. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/12/2002

MUI Ind lost a WHOPPING 981 million for the fiscal year!

Feb 2004. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/12/2003

MUI Ind lost 166 million for the fiscal year.

Feb 2005. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/12/2004

MUI Ind lost a WHOPPING 409 million for the fiscal year!

Feb 2006 Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/12/2005

MUI Ind lost a WHOPPING 396 million for the fiscal year!

Feb 2007. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/12/2006

MUI Ind lost a WHOPPING 218 million for the fiscal year!

How?

Amazed?

You reckon MUI Ind should be awarded with a record for its ability to burn so little money since 2000?

Well, if my calculator fails me not, thats about some 2.2 billion ringgit that has been .....

Read more...

PMI's rescue package

Monday, December 17, 2007

I found the following article from the Edge Weekly extremely interesting: 17 Dec 2007: Corporate: Khoo forks out RM150 mil to save PMI. My comments will be in purple fonts.

17 Dec 2007: Corporate: Khoo forks out RM150 mil to save PMI
By Risen Jayaseelan

Pan Malaysian Industries Bhd (PMI) is inching closer to extricating itself from dire straits. The plan that Tan Sri Khoo Kay Peng has put in place for the PN17 status company involves him injecting more than RM150 million of his cash into it.

The money will be used to reduce PMI's debts and acquire properties that will give the company a stable income.

"Khoo is putting his money where his mouth is. PMI's restructuring is unlike others where asset injections or paper shuffling are involved. This is hard cash that is being injected in and indicates the seriousness of the owner to make things better for his company," notes an investment banker.

Last week, PMI submitted a revised restructuring plan.

"This, together with the fact that Khoo — the ultimate shareholder of the MUI group, which PMI is part of — is underwriting a share sale exercise by PMI means the restructuring plan has a high chance of being accepted by the authorities," another banker says.

The exercise involves PMI selling shares it owns in Malayan United Industries Bhd (MUI) to its (PMI's) shareholders. PMI currently has a 46.56% stake in MUI. It intends to reduce that to 20% by selling 26.56% of its stake.

( Ok... PMI is selling its stake in MUI back to PMI shareholders. This is why I find it so strange, cos PMI as stated, currently holds a 46.56% stake in MUI. Why sell it back to PMI? Why can't MUI sell it to other parties? Does PMI shareholders even want MUI shares? )

Khoo's portion alone is RM50 million, but since he is underwriting the offer, he could potentially end up spending RM154.6 million on the MUI shares.

Khoo controls 32.4% of PMI and only has a 2% direct stake in MUI. With his stake in PMI, Khoo is entitled to purchase 8.3% of MUI under the share sale agreement. If Khoo only takes up his portion, his direct stake in MUI will increase to 10.3%, and with PMI's remaining stake in MUI, he will be deemed to control about 30% of MUI.

Khoo's deemed stake in MUI could rise further and perhaps even trigger a mandatory general offer for MUI shares if PMI shareholders do not take up the offer. (This is because Khoo is underwriting PMI's offer for the sale of the shares.)

Two weeks ago, PMI announced it had secured the High Court's order for a par value and share premium reduction. Getting the court order for this is a necessary step before other aspects of PMI's restructuring can kick in.

Here's what PMI is essentially planning to do: It wants to shrink its share capital by 90% and reduce its share premium account of RM265.6 million. The next and more substantial step is to make a restricted and renounceable offer for sale of 515.4 million shares in MUI to its (PMI's) shareholders. This will be done at an indicative price of 30 sen, although it may be higher if MUI's share price appreciates closer to the fruition of the proposed sale.

Of the RM154.6 million that will be raised from the share sale, RM84 million will be used to reduce PMI's borrowings from RM207.7 million currently to RM123.7 million. If the shares are sold at a higher price, more money will be raised and more of PMI's debts will be settled.

The proposal states that RM50 million from the proceeds will be used to buy properties that will become "a new area of activity for PMI". These new properties are to generate rental income and positive returns for the group.

The first property is Menara PMI, a 15-storey building in Jalan Changkat Ceylon. Ten storeys of this building are occupied by offices while the first five storeys comprise a retail podium and two basement car parks. The building has a net lettable area of 104,011 sq ft and 87 parking bays. Almost 96% of the building has been tenanted to various companies within the MUI group. It recorded an approximate rental income of RM4 million per annum last year. The vendor of the property, another MUI group company, Pan Malaysian Holdings Bhd, acquired the building in 1994 for RM35 million. The property had a net book value of RM28.9 million as at Dec 31, 2006.

PMI is forking out another RM10 million to pay MUI Properties Bhd for 1,478 sq m of land located along Jalan Mayang, near Jalan Ampang, Kuala Lumpur. The plot lies between two high-end condominiums, Mayang Court Kondominium and D'Mayang Kondominium. MUI Properties bought the land in 1995 for RM1.9 million and the net book value of the property is RM2.4 million. Both properties have been valued by credible valuers.

However, the question is, why is PMI buying properties from within the MUI group? Could PMI not buy other land with the money it is raising?

( Again, I find it so complicating. One on hand, PMI is selling its stake in MUI to its PMI shareholders. And then, PMI is buying properties from MUI Prop. ????? Errr.... say what? I am lost here!)

A banker familiar with the proposal says as far as PMI is concerned, the properties have a lot of potential. "Hence, the source of the land shouldn't matter. What matters is Menara PMI will provide stable rental income while the land provides growth potential," he says. It is understood that the land will be used by PMI to put up a high-end condominium project, considering its strategic location. If done successfully, PMI could reap the necessary earnings to breathe life back into the company.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Anyway.... the first line, PMI is inching closer to extricating itself from dire straits.

I decided to have a peep at what PMI has done as a stock

May 2000. PMI had a Rights Issue

  • Renounceable rights issue of 978,421,500 new ordinary shares of RM0.50 each with 978,421,500 warrants attached at an issue price of RM0.55 per share, payable in full upon acceptance, on the basis of one (1) new ordinary share with one (1) warrant attached for every one (1) existing ordinary share held in Pan Malaysian Industries Berhad at 5.00 p.m. on 23 June 2000

Let's look at the quarterly earnings posted at Bursa. (links are clickable)

30th May 2000: Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/3/2000

PMI reported a loss of 8.596 million for its fy 2000. (previous year, it lost 222.790 million)

30th May 2001: Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/3/2001

PMI reported a loss of of 96.548 million.

23rd May 2002: Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/3/2002

PMI reported a loss of of 384.254 million.

29th May 2003: Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/3/2003

PMI reported a loss of of 510.411 million.

4th June 2003: Another rights issue: Rights Issue

  • The ratio of the Rights Issue of two (2) Rights Shares for every five (5) existing ordinary shares of RM0.50 each in PMI held on the Entitlement Date as stated above is based on Scenario I (as defined below) for illustrative purposes only. The final basis of the Rights Issue will be determined immediately after the Entitlement Date depending on the number of Warrants exercised on or prior to the Entitlement Date under Scenarios I, II or III (as set out below).

21st May 2004. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/3/2004

PMI reported a loss of of 83.878 million.

20th May 2005. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/3/2005

PMI reported a profit of 102 million.

9th March 2006. PMIND-Classification as a new PN17 Company

31st May 2006. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/3/2006

PMI reported a loss of of 172 million.

30th May 2007. Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 31/3/2007

PMI reported a loss of of 123 million.

Not an impressive track record, yes? And if not mistaken, PMI had a rights issue back in 1998 too!

My...

Read more...

MUI's purchase of MetroJaya II

Wednesday, November 1, 2006

Look at this statement made.


"We feel this restructuring is mutually beneficial as it allows the MUI group to consolidate and enlarge its retailing division, which also controls the Laura Ashley group," said MUI Properties Bhd's executive director George Tang in a statement.

"Under MUI, Metrojaya will be able to expand more aggressively in Malaysia as well as in the region," he added.

What's so wrong?

Well, Metrojaya WAS once a listed stock.

MetroJaya WAS once doing fine until they privatise it.

Uner MUI, can MetroJaya expand aggressively?

Perhaps a guage of MUI's earnings performace would be a GOOD indicator.

No?

MUI has lost money its last 5 fiscal years!!!



  1. fy 2001 lost 18.652 million

  2. fy 2002 lost 996.506 million

  3. fy 2003 lost 174.043 million

  4. fy 2004 lost 405.474 million

  5. fy 2005 lost 419.805 million

Currently? MUI lost 334.077 million for its most recent 4 quarters.

And look at what's being said again: "We feel this restructuring is mutually beneficial as it allows the MUI group to consolidate and enlarge its retailing division, which also controls the Laura Ashley group"

Here's the trick question.

So such a restructuring, how and WHO DOES it benefit???

Read more...

MUI's purchase of MetroJaya

Saw this news clip


I had blogged on the Privatisation issue of MetroJaya before. Click here

=========================================

13th Aug 2003.

That was the date when MetroJaya announced that its parent holding company, PMI, is making a VGO to buy up the remaining shares of MetroJaya at an offer price of 1.25. (the offer price was later raised to 1.35)

See
MetroJaya's VGO

The following is MetroJaya's quarterly earnings posted some 10 days after the VGO announcement:
Quarterly rpt on consolidated results for the financial period ended 30/6/2003

From the earnings announcement we can see the following issues:

1. MetroJaya was in a clean slate of health. No borrowings at all.
2. Piggy bank cash totalled 100.149 million.
3. Amount due from holding company was 85.268 million.
4. MetroJaya total number of shares totals some 124.921 million.

Now consider this, if the holding company, PMI repays the moolah owed to its subsidiary, this would mean that Metrojaya's cash alone would total some 185.417 million.

This would work out to some cash per share value of 1.48 sen per share. (185.417 divided by 124.921 million)

Soooooo how does one rate the fairness of this whole deal?

A VGO offer of 1.25 when the company's cash per share is 1.48.

Fair onot?

Someone posed the following question to me before...



WHy do u think a listed company chose to be private and instead of continue to be listed? If the benefit to be privatised is NOT SUBSTANTIALLY more than being listed, no sane management would choose this path, would they?

How? Do you think that's a good point?

And now consider this also. MetroJaya embarked on a sharebuyback program a couple of months before the VGO was announced and continued doing so after the VGO announcement! (this is one of their buyback announcement:
Notice of Shares Buy Back - Immediate Announcement )

And of course, not all shareholders were happy with the offer. The majority accepted the offer but there were some shareholders who were wise enough to understand that this whole offer was totally blatantly unfair to them.

The following article puts everything into perspective in my opinion:
A Question Of Timing

Let's look at some of the issues mentioned.



Last Monday, Metrojaya declared an interim dividend of 34 sen per share gross or a total payout of RM42.84 million for the current financial year (FY) ending March 31, 2005, to be paid on Dec 22.

This came shortly after it paid RM18.9 million, or 15 sen per share, in interim dividends for FY2004 on June 18.

Both dividends add up to RM61.74 million (before tax), which is three times Metrojaya's accumulated profits of RM21.1 million as at Sept 30.

This drew some feedback from a friend: "First throw out the minority shareholders with a crazy low price (less than the cash per share!!!!), now they "suddenly" start to pay huge dividends. For your info, average dividend over the last 10 years or so was between 3 and 4 ct nett."

But while Metrojaya's minority shareholders (which now hold 9.33%) are finally reaping some rewards from the company's attractive cash reserves, perhaps not everyone is happy.


"Those who had accepted the VGO and sold their shares in January cannot benefit from the recent generous dividends," says a broker. He says these ex-minority shareholders had previously accounted for 25.95% of Metrojaya's shareholding.

Should Metrojaya have paid out the generous dividends before the VGO to benefit more minority shareholders?


Very well said. Those that accepted the VGO would surely not be happy!

Why did MetroJaya only decided to pay out generous dividends AFTER the VGO?


By making the generous dividends after the VGO, PMI has been able to retain more dividends from Metrojaya as it has a higher shareholding 90.67%," says a market observer.

And those minority shareholders that accepted that VGO would probably be disgusted and shattered when they read the following article in today's Star:

Capital repayment to enhance Metrojaya’s return on assets

Sooooo how just was MetroJaya's privatisation exercise?

===============================

A VGO offer of 1.25 when the company's cash per share is 1.48.


And now MUI wants to buy these shares at what price?

Here was some issues asked by a LIVERPOOL fan. (see http://sahamas.net/forum10/1147.html )

Didn't PMI make a GO to minority shareholders of Metrojaya at RM1.40 (or thereabouts) a few years ago?

Didn't the independent directors of Metrojaya advise minority shareholders that the GO price was a good price?

Didn't the merchant bankers of Metrojaya advise minority shareholders that the GO price was a good price?

Didn't Metrojaya pay some very handsome dividends since PMI achieved 91.06% stake from the GO exercise?

And now Metrojaya is worth RM2.40 per share.

HOW??????

Here is what's said in the news article.

  • PROPERTY developer and retailer Malayan United Industries Bhd (MUIB) plans to buy Metrojaya Bhd from Pan Malaysia Industries Bhd (PMI) for RM273 million.

    MUIB, through its wholly-owned unit Libertyray (M) Sdn Bhd, will purchase Metrojaya at RM2.40 per share for a 91.06 per cent stake.

    Both groups are related because PMI owns 46.56 per cent in MUIB.

    "We feel this restructuring is mutually beneficial as it allows the MUI group to consolidate and enlarge its retailing division, which also controls the Laura Ashley group," said MUI Properties Bhd's executive director George Tang in a statement.

    "Under MUI, Metrojaya will be able to expand more aggressively in Malaysia as well as in the region," he added.

    Metrojaya has six departmental stores, one hypermarket and 70 various specialty stores under the names of East India Co, Somerset Bay, Living Quarters, Reject Shop and Cape Cod.

    Other house brands include Zona, Freego, Passages and Kookies.

    MUIB will fund the acquisition through cash and loans and hopes to complete the deal by March next year.

    PMI, meanwhile, will gain about RM143.43 million from the transaction. The sale proceeds will be used to reduce borrowings, which was about RM727.79 million as at June 2006.

    Metrojaya will contribute positively to the group, MUIB said.

    Analysts concurred and said Metrojaya will fit nicely under MUIB's portfolio, particularly given its experience in managing the reputable UK-based Laura Ashley group.

    There are plans to expand Metrojaya's department stores and push its products overseas.

    Metrojaya chief executive officer Robert Heng told Business Times previously that the group hopes to open at least another 10 specialty stores by the end of its March 31 2007 financial year.

    Metrojaya recorded pre-tax profit before exceptional items of RM24.8 million on RM347.4 million revenue for the year ended March 31 2006.

    MUIB will make a mandatory general offer to acquire the remaining Metrojaya shares at RM2.40 each.

    MUIB and PMI shares were suspended yesterday and will resume trading today.

    Earlier, MUIB closed at 17.5 sen while PMI closed at 4 sen.

Sigh!!!

Sometimes we ask why INVESTORS have no interest in the market.

When listed companies PLAYS SUCH FUNKY MUSIC... how lah?

Read more...

  © Blogger templates Newspaper by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP