everything: Paul Krugman: Are The Rating Agencies Corrupted?

Posted the other day: Credit Ratings Sold For A Buck Or Two..

Paul Krugman had an editorial piece on NY Times: Berating the Raters

Some highlights from his piece.

... The bad news is that most of the headlines were about the wrong e-mails. When Goldman Sachs employees bragged about the money they had made by shorting the housing market, it was ugly, but that didn’t amount to wrongdoing.

Now get this..

the e-mail messages you should be focusing on are the ones from employees at the credit rating agencies, which bestowed AAA ratings on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of dubious assets, nearly all of which have since turned out to be toxic waste. And no, that’s not hyperbole: of AAA-rated subprime-mortgage-backed securities issued in 2006, 93 percent — 93 percent! — have now been downgraded to junk status.

Bottom line? The rating agencies got it wrong by a whopping 93%!!!

Gosh, surely you would ask if them agencies knew what they were doing or are they simply incompetent?

If not... are they ....

What those e-mails reveal is a deeply corrupt system. And it’s a system that financial reform, as currently proposed, wouldn’t fix.

Paul Krugman is calling it a deeply corrupt system.

"How can it be? It's simply capitalism at work here!!!"

Would you accept the above statement? This is all the work of a capitalist financial world?

And it did. The Senate subcommittee has focused its investigations on the two biggest credit rating agencies, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s; what it has found confirms our worst suspicions. In one e-mail message, an S.& P. employee explains that a meeting is necessary to “discuss adjusting criteria” for assessing housing-backed securities “because of the ongoing threat of losing deals.” Another message complains of having to use resources “to massage the sub-prime and alt-A numbers to preserve market share.” Clearly, the rating agencies skewed their assessments to please their clients.

Home